So I think that I pretty much got my paper figured out. I finally got a good outline going so that it can be well structured. I think it will take me a while to put everything together to make it as flawless as possible. The one main thing that I think I have to work on is coming up with more to say about my real world connection. I think that what I do have is good, but I just do not know if it will be enough to reach the seven page requirement for the paper. After speaking to the professor about my argument, I decided that I should first start out by speaking about Buffy’s necessity to kill due to her destiny to protect the lives of innocent people from the vampires. I will then relate that to a real world example on how certain people also have the ability to kill without consequence. I will use the military to prove this point. Next I will go back to Buffy to state that she does not always kill any vampire that she crosses. I will use Angel to prove this. I will say this because it depends on if Buffy thinks the person deserves to be killed. Angel displays that he is not all evil, so Buffy decides to spare his life. After I am done talking about Buffy, I will then move on to say how the real world examples also depend on whether or not certain people deserve to die. I will use the death penalty to describe this. Not everyone is charged with the death penalty, so I will relate this to how Buffy does not kill every single vampire.
The thing that I need help with is coming up with more to add. I need to know what else I can say that relates the real world example with Buffy killing vampires, and the real world example with Buffy sparing the vampire’s lives. Maybe if I had more real world examples to help argue my point, or if someone just has any ideas on how I can argue that my real world example relates to Buffy. If you have an idea, please let me know.
No comments:
Post a Comment